Arizona Alliance for Livable Communities

Coalition Board member Bernie Hoenle will be participating in the AALC, and reporting on items of interest to Arizona bicyclists.


Notes from Arizona Alliance for Livable Communities livableaz.org meeting 9/14/2022

1. Referenced National Recreation and Parks Association international convention being held in Phoenix 9/20-23/2022. Wide range of topics from health related to planning, security, equity… and does have a session on ebikes and other surface transportation.

2. Advocacy letter which CAZBike added their support.
Bipartisan bill supporting safe streets and the Vision Zero program, here’s a copy of the letter.

3. Prop 400 which would keep tax funds supporting AZ roads was vetoed by the Governor. Plans to resurrect are underway, but challenging timing. (Maricopa county is the only AZ County that needs to get state approval.)

4. Road Safety Action Plan incorporates Vision Zero. AZ record for large number of pedestrian fatalities. There is $10M dedicated funding. Working to align projects with focus on overall safety. Some contention based on POV. Concerted effort
to improve underserved communities.

5. Phoenix hired first Public Health Advisor, Nicole Dupuis-Witt. Starts 10/17/2022. To address city top priorities: heat response/mitigation, housing, homelessness, food systems, senior services, transportation, and more…

6. Some discussion on General Obligation Bonds. How they can be used to support multiple aspects of streets, pedestrians, cycling – tie to Capital Improvement Projects.

7. Planning and health: members reviewing municipal plans. Planning guidance and references on: liveableaz.org/general-plans/ Making connections and communications with all parties important for success.

8. Bisbee – active group advocating better biking and walking in the area.

References:
nrpa.org
apbp.org
azaep.org
phoenix.gov
bisbeebikeways.com

Is Your Community Following National Guidelines When Installing Bicycle Lanes?

The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) both provide guidelines for communities to use when determining the appropriate type of bike lane on streets and roadways. Both agencies recommend that separated or protected bike lanes be used for roads at much lower speeds than are seen in most Arizona communities. Continue reading Is Your Community Following National Guidelines When Installing Bicycle Lanes?

Meet Earl Ratledge

A lifelong bicycle rider, Earl Ratledge can be found riding around the east valley for recreation and to run errands. He rides a road bike, mountain bike, folding single speed, and an upright bike with baskets in the back. For 13 years Earl commuted between Mesa and Phoenix using a mix of bike-bus-bike, bike-bus-walk and bike-bus-light rail; and for 3 years took his kids to school in a bike trailer. Over the years he has taken part in bicycle races, multi-day rides, bike camping, and charity rides.

Earl is the editor of the Coalition’s newsletter and has published articles on the Coalition’s website. He has volunteered with CycloMesa, Recycle Your Bicycle and Tour de Fat. Earl also developed a public dashboard which maps crashes in Arizona that involve people on bicycles and identifies the most dangerous intersections and corridors.

Earl can be reached at newsletter@cazbike.org

 

People Who Ride Bicycles on the Roadway Already Pay Their Share

People Who Ride Bicycles on the Roadway Already Pay Their Share

When there is conversation about building bicycle facilities, we often hear rumblings that people who ride bicycles don’t pay their fair share of the expense of transportation infrastructure. This statement is not true. Bicycle riders often pay more than their share for the amount of bicycle infrastructure created, and for the amount of roadway they actually use. Bicycle riders also provide more financial contributions to the local economy then drivers of cars.

Most bicycle facilities in the United States are built at the local level, with little or no funding coming from the federal taxes on gasoline and truck tires that support the Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF). In 2017, 74% of the $177B spent on road and highway infrastructure in the United States came from state and local government.[i] As a result, the argument that all or most roadway money comes from the HTF and should not be used for bicycle infrastructure is not supported. The money used locally usually comes from general tax payer dollars, and people who don’t drive cars pay those taxes. Another source of local transportation money comes from property tax, which homeowners pay directly and renters pay through their rent.[ii]

Overall, in the U.S., close to 50% of roadway construction and maintenance is paid for by income tax and other non-gas tax revenue sources. [iii] [iv]

Cost to Support Roadways

Based on estimates from 2015, the average U.S. household could be paying more than $1100 per year in taxes and other costs to support roadways. This includes households that don’t own cars or use alternative sources of mobility. [v]

  • $597 in general taxes for road construction and repair
  • $199 to $675 for subsidies to motor vehicle drivers (parking, gas tax exemptions, etc.)
  • $216 in government expenses related to traffic crashes
  • $93 to $360 for costs related to air pollution

Many of the costs related to motor vehicles (air pollution, noise pollution, crash damage to non-drivers and property, etc.) are paid for by crash victims, taxpayers and the government (which gets most of its money from taxpayers).[vi]  Jeff Speck, the author of the book the Walkable City, estimates that in the U.S. vehicle drivers are subsidized $10 for every $1 they actual pay for infrastructure.[vii]

Households without Cars

The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that about 9% of households do not have regular access to a motor vehicle for transportation.[viii] In the greater Phoenix area that is estimated to be about 6%.[ix]  Some research shows the number of U.S. households without motor vehicles has increased slightly from 2010.[x] The 2016 American Community Survey showed both a decrease in single vehicle drivers commuting and an increase in people on bicycles commuting.[xi]

Local Transportation Funding

Determining how transportation is funded at the local level is not always the easiest. For this article a number of Arizona communities provided information on how to access their transportation budget on line. None of the sites had clear “dollars in to dollars out” comparisons. As an example, the City of Mesa 2020 budget for transportation shows spending of $39.53M. Based on conversations with city staff, that money comes from the State Highway Users Revenue Fund (HURF) and a funding source called The Local Street Fund. Money from these sources covers Mesa’s street repair and maintenance. Street Bonds and the Transportation Fund support specific transportation projects, with a projected 2022 spending of $211M. Using the budgets posted online there did not appear to be clear way to determine what spending went to bicycle infrastructure.[xii]

Regional Transportation Funding

Maricopa and Pima Counties currently have one half cent sales taxes that support their regional transportation plans. Again this is paid by all shoppers regardless of motor vehicle ownership or miles driven. In Maricopa County only 10.5 percent of the money collected through that tax goes to arterial street improvements; 56.2 percent goes to freeways and state highways, and 33.3 percent going to public transit. [xiii]

State Transportation Funding

In Arizona, fuel and motor vehicle license taxes support 80% of the Highway Users Revenue Fund (HURF), [xiv]  but 62% of state transportation spending coming from state and local taxes.[xv] ADOT states that HURF is constrained by use of more fuel efficient vehicles, inflation, and the lack of an increase in the state gas tax for over 25 years.[xvi]

Federal Transportation Funding

Taking the federal gas tax, the heavy truck tire tax, and other motor vehicle user fees into consideration, the amount of money collected has never covered the cost of operating the part of the roadway system they are supposed to support.[xvii]  Between 2008 and 2018, 114.7 billion dollars were transferred from the General Fund of the Treasury to the Federal Highway Trust Fund (HTF).[xviii] Moneys in the Federal Treasury’s General Fund are primarily tax dollars collected from people and businesses. [ii]

As a result of inflation, improved motor vehicle fuel economy, reduced motor vehicle miles driven, and the increase in electric vehicles, moneys collected for the HTF are not expected to increase. [ii] Congressional Budget Office estimates, made in 2020, are that the HTF will hit a zero balance starting in 2022, and that zero balance will continue for all future years unless there is a change to the gas tax.[xix] [xx] It is estimated that highway spending would need to increase by 40% over the next 10 years to fund all existing highway construction and maintenance projects. [xxi] The deficit in the HFT is expected to reach $200B by 2030.[xxii]

Motor Vehicle Driver Subsidies

Drivers of motor vehicles can receive federally tax supported subsidies that are not available riders of bicycles. Employers can receive a subsidy for electric vehicle charging stations, but not for chargers for e-bikes. People can put part of their salary in a tax free fund for workplace car parking or public transit, but there isn’t tax free fund that supports bicycle riding. There is currently a tax credit for purchase of an electric car, but no tax credit for the purchase of an electric or non-electric bicycle. [xxiii]

Bicycle Rider Impact on Roadways

At the local level, bicycle riders have a more positive financial impact compared to motor vehicles when considering pollution, roadway maintenance, health, and other measures. Bicycle infrastructure uses fewer resources to build and maintain. Bicycle riders have less impact on the roadway, use a fraction of the space used by motor vehicles, and cause less crashes. A review of 10 studies showed that the financial benefit of active transportation programs was greater than the cost of those programs.  [xxiv]

Bicycle Rider Impact on Local Economy

Bicycle riders also do more to improve the local economy. A number of studies show that people who ride bicycles in urban centers spend more money and shop more often with local businesses than people who drive cars.[xxv] [xxvi] [xxvii]  This likely means that bicycle riders are paying more money in local taxes than vehicle drivers.  In an area of Los Angeles where motor vehicle lanes were removed and replaced with bicycle lanes, the sales taxes collected almost doubled.[xxviii]

Conclusion

As people who ride bicycles, we are clearly supporting our share of the traffic infrastructure we use to ride, along with supporting infrastructure for motor vehicles. Keep this in mind when advocating for new bicycle facilities and the maintenance of existing infrastructure.

—–

[i] _____, The Highway Trust Fund Explained, Peter P. Peterson Foundation, 2020, https://www.pgpf.org/budget-basics/budget-explainer-highway-trust-fund

[ii] Blue, Bikenomics, How Bicycles Can Save The Economy, Microcosm Publishing, 2016

[iii] Cammenga, How Are Your State’s Roads Funded?, Tax Foundation, 2019, https://taxfoundation.org/states-road-funding-2019/

[iv] Dutzik, et al., Who Pays for the Roads? How the “Users Pay” Myth  Gets in the Way, United States Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG), 2015, https://uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/Who%20Pays%20for%20Roads%20vUS.pdf

[v] Ibid.

[vi] Ibid.

[vii] Birenbaum, How to End the American Obsession With Driving, Vox, 2021, https://www.vox.com/22662963/end-driving-obsession-connectivity-zoning-parking

[viii] _____, American Community Survey, Why We Ask About Vehicles Available, U.S. Census Bureau, ____, https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/vehicles/

[ix] Peterson, Car Owner Statistics (2021 Report), ValuePenguin, 2021, https://www.valuepenguin.com/auto-insurance/car-ownership-statistics

[x] Gershgorn, After decades of decline, no-car households are becoming more common in the US, Quartz, 2016, https://qz.com/873704/no-car-households-are-becoming-more-common-in-the-us-after-decades-of-decline/

[xi] Tomer, America’s commuting choices: 5 major takeaways from 2016 census data, Brookings, 2017, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2017/10/03/americans-commuting-choices-5-major-takeaways-from-2016-census-data/

[xii] _____, City of Mesa’s Open Budget, City of Mesa, AZ, 2021, https://openbudget.mesaaz.gov/#!/year/default

[xiii] _____, 2022-2026 Current Five-Year Transportation Facilities Construction Program, Arizona Department of Transportation, 2021, https://apps.azdot.gov/ADOTLibrary/Multimodal_Planning_Division/FiveYrPlan/Five_Year_Program-FY2022-26.pdf

[xiv] Boesen, Who Will Pay for the Roads?, Tax Foundation, 2022, https://taxfoundation.org/road-funding-vehicle-miles-traveled-tax/

[xv] _____, 2022-2026 Current Five-Year Transportation Facilities Construction Program.

[xvi] Ibid.

[xvii] Dutzik, et al., Who Pays for the Roads? How the “Users Pay” Myth  Gets in the Way.

[xviii]_____, The Highway Trust Fund Publication No. FHWA-PL-17-011, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Policy and Government Affairs, 2017 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/olsp/fundingfederalaid/07.cfm

[xix] York, How Did We Ever Agree to Infrastructure Investments, Tax Foundation, 2021, https://taxfoundation.org/infrastructure-investment/

[xx]_____, Highway Trust Fund Accounts—CBO’s Baseline as of March 6, 2020, Congressional Budget Office, 2020, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2020-03/51300-2020-03-highwaytrustfund.pdf

[xxi] _____, The Highway Trust Fund Explained.

[xxii]_____, Supplemental Data for The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2021 to 2031, Congressional Budget Office, 2021, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2021-02/51300-2021-02-highwaytrustfund.pdf

[xxiii] Zipper, What if Congress Helped Bicyclists, and Not Drivers, for Once?, Slate, 2021, https://slate.com/business/2021/09/bicycles-reconciliaton-congress-ebikes.html

[xxiv] Dutzik, et al., Who Pays for the Roads? How the “Users Pay” Myth  Gets in the Way.

[xxv] _____, Measuring the Street: New Metrics for 21st Century Streets, New York City DOT, _____, http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/2012-10-measuring-the-street.pdf

[xxvi] Ayre, Salt Lake City Street’s Decision To Replace Parking With Bike Lanes Boosted Business, bikocity, 2016,  https://bikocity.com/salt-lake-city-streets-decision-replace-parking-bike-lanes-boosted-business/

[xxvii] Clifton, et al. , Consumer Behavior and Travel Choices: A Focus on Cyclists and Pedestrians, Portland State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2012, https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/consumer_behavior_and_travel_choices_clifton.pdf

[xxviii] McCormick, York Blvd, The Economics of a Road Diet , UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, _____, https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/yorkblvd_mccormick.pdf

Coalition of Arizona Bicyclist’s Annual member’s meeting 10/19/2021

This year, the annual business meeting will be held via tele-conference.
A business meeting and election of open board of directors seats will be held.

  • Tuesday, October 19 , 2021 at 6:30PM Arizona Time.

Members in good standing who wish to attend/listen/vote please contact cazbike@cazbike.org no later than 10/13 to obtain the phone in details. Not a member? Click here to join.

Nominations, or self-nominations for the Board of Directors are still open, and as always we’re looking for volunteers in any capacity. Continue reading Coalition of Arizona Bicyclist’s Annual member’s meeting 10/19/2021

ADOT Bicycling and Pedestrian Notifications

If you are interested in receiving notifications about ADOT projects that impact bicycling and walking in your area in Arizona, you can subscribe at activetransportation.az.gov look for the big green “subscribe for notifications” button.

After subscribing, you can adjust which regions you will be notified by clicking on “subscriber preferences”

Note that the notifications only apply to roads maintained by ADOT, the state highway system.

While you are visiting azbikeped.org be sure and check out Arizona Bicycling Street Smarts. [online version available from archive.org]

 

 

 

You Can Help Improve Your Communities Bicycle Network

Bike Lane Signs - GilbertA number of Arizona communities recently passed initiatives to expand transportation infrastructure including improving bicycle facilities. In addition, there is proposed federal legislation that would make additional moneys available for expanding active transportation networks. This poses the question, what can you as an individual do to improving bicycle facilities in your community?

The first recommendation is to review the city’s transportation plan and active transportation plan if there is one. Do these have specific goals in creating bicycle infrastructure? If so, that should be a guide in the development process. Also determine if your community has a bicycle coordinator or a specific person to contact for bicycle related projects and programs. This is someone you can reach out to directly with your questions and concerns. Some cities, such as Flagstaff and Tucson, have citizen bicycle committees. Many cities have a specific web page with this information.

Once your communities’ plans have been reviewed and understood, there are a number of approaches for improvement. While it would be best for communities to work on all the approaches listed below, resource limitations make this unrealistic.

One approach is to improve the existing bicycle network. This includes

  • Updating all bike lanes in the network to follow the guidelines for lane width and separation
  • Make sure that bike lanes don’t have gaps or just end, leaving riders in dangerous situations
  • Make sure intersections where the network crosses major streets are set up for safe crossing
  • Install a method for people on bicycles to activate traffic signal at signaled intersections
  • Make sure there is sufficient signage to identify the bicycle network for riders and drivers
  • Work with other communities so bicycle networks connect across jurisdictions

Another approach would be to develop a new bicycle network or expand the existing network. This could focus on creating or improving routes

  • From high population areas to high employment areas
  • In areas with low car ownership and/or high numbers of bicycle commuters
  • For better connection with public transit

A third approach would be to focus on high crash intersections and corridors.

  • Identify the most dangerous areas for people on bicycles
  • Develop infrastructure changes that improve safety for all road users

Some of these approaches could overlap. For example, if the goal was to bring all bicycle lanes in compliance with guidelines from National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), the bike lanes on the most dangerous corridors could be the priority.

A recent analysis by the Virginia Department of Transportation found that zero vehicle households and employment density were two of the strongest predictors of the locations of crashes between motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles. The number of zero vehicle households and employment density for all U.S. cities is available from the U.S. Census Bureau as part of the American Community Survey. In Maricopa County, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) manages an interactive mapping website with census information; including population, employment, rate of car ownership, and transportation mode by zip code and census block. https://ims.azmag.gov/ This information is also available for all areas of Arizona through the U.S. Census Bureau using the Census Reporter and other Census tools. https://censusreporter.org/

Other pertinent traffic information is often available online. The City of Mesa updates their traffic counts annually at https://www.mesaaz.gov/residents/streets-transportation/traffic-counts, and provides a map showing posted speed limits at https://www.mesaaz.gov/home/showpublisheddocument?id=35998. Your community likely has this type of information available to help determine if the appropriate bicycle facilities are in place on your streets.

An interactive dashboard which includes a map of Arizona bicycle crash locations from 2015 to 2019 is located at https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/et.ratledge/viz/ArizonaTrafficCrashesInvolvingBicycles/AZBicycleCrashes.

If you are interested in how bicycle facilities should be designed, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), NACTO, and others offer a number of free resources for bikeway design and selection. These include the

The FHWA offers free Bicycle Facility Design training through its National Highway Institute. This training is open to anyone. https://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/course-search?tab=0&typ=3&sf=0&course_no=142080

Regardless of your place in the bicycle community, rider, advocate, planner, engineer or elected official, you can participate in working to improve and expand the bicycle network. You can start reviewing the information available in your area and working with others to make your roads safer and more efficient for people on bicycle.

Your Opportunity to Comment On the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is up for review and comments are being accepted through May 14, 2021. As stated in the Federal Register, the MUTCD is “recognized as the national standard for traffic control devices used on all public roads.” The standards in this manual include traffic controls, signs, and roadway markings. The MUTCD has historically focused on moving motor vehicle traffic quickly, with little regard for the safety of non-motorized road users.

This is an opportunity for you to recommend changes to the MUTCD that are more inclusive for people that ride bicycles on our roadways. We created a template that you can use as a guide in providing your own comment to the Federal Highway Administration (FWHA). Please copy this letter, make any changes you feel are appropriate, and post to the Federal Register Comment Site listed below.


To: Stephanie Pollack
Acting Administrator
Federal Highway Administration

As a member/supporter of the Coalition of Arizona Bicyclists, I request that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) be revised to better support non-motorized road users. Changes should be made to lower speeds, improve bicycle facilities, and treat all road users equally. These changes can create a shift that will reduce traffic deaths and injuries, and make it easier for people that are not in cars to move around their communities.

The MUCTD currently prioritizes the fast movement of motorized traffic without regard to the safety of other road users. This should change. Specific changes that should be made include:

      • Stop using the 85th percentile when setting speed limits. There are more current methodologies that better account for the needs of non-motorized road users.
      • Review bicycle related signage and road marking. Consider making optional signs and road marking required, and allow bicycle rider specific signs.
      • Stop using the number of people killed or injured as the measurement that ‘warrants’ changes to make a roadway or intersection safer.
      • Incorporate the criteria from the FHWA’s Bikeway Section Guide into the MUTCD so that selection of the appropriate bicycle facility for a roadway is based on traffic speed and volume.

Bicycle ridership has been on the increase in the United States, so please consider people on bicycles and other non-motorized road users in the review and changes to the Manual Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

Sincerely, [your name here]


Please note that all comments become public information. So be aware of what you write, and decide for yourself what personally identifying information you include.

Federal Register Comment Site: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/02/2021-01440/national-standards-for-traffic-control-devices-the-manual-on-uniform-traffic-control-devices-for#open-comment

Further Resources:

MUTCD Official Site https://mutcd.info/

MUTCD Bicycle Page: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2009/part9.pdf

Toole Design posted a table that contains specific wording changes and location of those changes in the revised MUTCD. This document can be searched for specific bicycle references.  https://www.regulations.gov/comment/FHWA-2020-0001-0853

Learn more about the MUTCD at this recorded webinar: The ’Notorious’ MUTCD – Why Fixing a Federal Manual is Critical to Safety, Equity and Climate https://americawalks.org/the-notorious-mutcd-webinar-recording/